[Soekris] soekris 4801 and pfsense 2.x
ngyurov at gmail.com
Tue Sep 10 19:17:44 CEST 2013
If you don't reqiure custom modifications all the time, no different
user access to the interface etc. you could just create the pf.conf
and use it on an OpenBSD installation (this is what I use, other BSDs
may be fine too). It wouldn't need as much RAM as pfSense.
However, this wouldn't help with the throughput limits.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S4 LTE
On Sep 10, 2013 1:47 PM, "chahid ouarzoun" <chahid.ouarzoun at gmail.com> wrote:
> so the 4801 can be use only for monowall or small firewall ;)
> 2013/9/10 Eric Boudrand <dev at boudrand.net>
>> > > does the soekris
>> > > 4801
>> > > will
>> > > support all this traffic ?
>> > The 4801 is very limited and realistically scales up to 4kpps
>> > to 10kpps depending on the OS.
>> > The pfsense web interface is very heavy and modern versions
>> > don't even run on boxes like the 4801 due to RAM limitations.
>> > You are better off with a 5501 or 6501 box.
>> I have been using pfSense on a 5501 and a 6501 with load balancing over
>> 2 ADSL lines. It works quite good. Web access to pfsense interface is
>> quicker on 6501 device. If you have a lot of connected computer on you
>> lan, you should use a device with high CPU. It increases WAN access
>> I had an issue with the net6501 that deals with faulty SSD drive. Use as
>> much as possible nanoBSD version and redirect syslog events to an
>> internal syslog server.
>> Éric Boudrand
>> Soekris-tech mailing list
>> Soekris-tech at lists.soekris.com
> Chahid Ouarzoun
> skype: visptelco
> tel fr: +33 1 77 69 57 12
> tel ma: +212 5 24 29 18 95
> gsm ma: +212 650 47 77 79
> Soekris-tech mailing list
> Soekris-tech at lists.soekris.com
More information about the Soekris-tech