[Soekris] OT: Re: Any suggestion for alternative?

[Steve Holdoway]

On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 18:17:55 -0600
RB <aoz.syn at gmail.com> wrote:

> > While I agree with the speed sentiment, Vmware *doesn't* require a special processor. Xen does, and I think qemu does as well...
> 
> Beat me to it, but not quite correct - neither Xen nor qemu require
> said support,  qemu can even be completely userspace (yes, there is a
> kqemu accelerator that isn't required).  Are Xen/VMware slower w/o
> svm/vmx?  Absolutely, but still not required, unless you've read docs
> I haven't.
Xen must've improved then, since the time about a year ago when I tried to use it and it refused on an old P4 based system...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.soekris.com/pipermail/soekris-tech/attachments/20080317/c4b79704/attachment.bin