[Soekris] Choosing Compact flash (Was: Memory upgrade)
Pontus Pihlgren
pontus at update.uu.se
Mon Dec 17 16:03:21 UTC 2007
Wim Vandeputte - Mailinglists only skrev:
> hey,
>
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 03:51:49PM +0100, Pontus Pihlgren wrote:
>
>> Now it's time to choose a CF card. I'm considering either 2 GB or 4 GB.
>> I'll try to run vanilla OpenBSD, so I expect at least 1 GB to be
>> necessary for the base install. What are your experience? Is it nice to
>> have the extra headroom the 4GB gives?
>>
>
> OpenBSD will just fit on 512 MB, including the compiler and docs.
> But that is just a bit too small when you do a recompile (due to files kept
> open by running processes).
>
> 1 GB is just fine
>
> Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
> /dev/wd1a 394M 37.9M 336M 10% /
> /dev/wd1h 349M 46.0K 331M 0% /home
> /dev/wd1d 1008M 448M 510M 47% /usr
> /dev/wd1e 508M 9.5M 473M 2% /var
> mfs:32145 9.5M 10.0K 9.5M 0% /tmp
>
> You can keep
>
> /dev/wd1g 1009M 2.0K 958M 0% /usr/obj
> /dev/wd1f 690M 630M 25.4M 96% /usr/src
>
> on a cheaper USB memory stick (even keep the compiler on there if you are
> paranoid)
>
> If you want a full /usr/src and /usr/obj, you can get away with 2 GB
> but only if you have a custom /etc/mk.conf where you disable the DEBUG
> that bloats the libs
>
>
>> Also, how important is speed? I think a read speed of 20 MB/s is quite
>> sufficient, no?
>>
>
> Speed is the least of my worries, you boot a system only once and usually
> you don't really care much about reads (perhaps more the writes).
>
> I prefer industrial grade CF with wear leveling algorithms but they are
> more expensive than consumer grade CF.
>
Sounds like I should go for a slower 4GB for the extra headroom. Or, if
I compile what I need on another machine, I could do with 2GB (even less).
Wear leveling would be nice, but it looks like it might be cheaper to
make backups and buy a new card in case of failure.
Regards,
Pontus
More information about the Soekris-tech
mailing list