[Soekris] arguments for ADDing flash to an hdd-based system?

[Tenzen]

> Actually, I think that NanoBSD is quite nice, it may not be so well
> documented (if that's what you meant)
> however the final product is rock-solid stable (much like FreeBSD
> itself)

i'd heard about nanobsd, picobsd & tinybsd, but had yet to use/deploy
any of them.

at the moment, i'm wondering about the wisdom of building 'even/just'
nanobsd ON a soekris box -- might take awhile.  that's simply in
comparison to the challenges of remote boot via tftp/nfs ...

for a local/occasional system, having a flash-based solution might
well be handy; for remote systems that may number in the hundreds, a
net-based solution may be more straightforward to administer.

--Tenzen

--Tenzen