[Soekris] WiFi card failures in 4526's
Jim Cromie
jim.cromie at gmail.com
Sat Jul 15 22:37:55 UTC 2006
Nate Nielsen wrote:
> Joshua ChaitinPollak wrote:
>
>> First off, does the Soekris have a temperature sensor or CPU
>> throttling ablities?
>>
>
> Yup.
>
>
>> How would I go about accessing that information
>> via Linux?
>>
>
> It's an LM75 chip. I believe there are various drivers and patches for
> Linux.
>
>
Im unaware of an LM-75 on-board (the net4801). Can you dig up a reference ?
The 4801 has a pc87366, which has temp monitor ckts.
Linux has pc8736x driver for its capabilities:
soekris:~# sensors
pc87366-isa-6620
Adapter: ISA adapter
avi0: +3.01 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +3.01 V)
VCORE: +1.99 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +3.01 V)
VCC: +4.96 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +6.03 V)
VPWR: +11.40 V (min = +5.93 V, max = +28.02 V)
+12V: +11.74 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +14.46 V)
-12V: -12.97 V (min = -60.61 V, max = -2.76 V)
GND: +0.00 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +3.01 V)
Vsb: +3.28 V (min = +3.00 V, max = +3.59 V)
Vdd: +2.93 V (min = +3.00 V, max = +3.59 V) ALARM
Vbat: +3.01 V (min = +2.40 V, max = +3.01 V)
AVdd: +3.28 V (min = +3.00 V, max = +3.59 V)
Temp: +99 C (low = +0 C, high = +125 C)
Critical: +126 C
Theres more here, including the /etc/sensors.conf that I borrowed
(and tweaked). Brix, can you add your sensor readings to your web-page ?
(Mine has a low Vdd, which might corrupt some readings (temp, hopefully)
http://dev.gentoo.org/~brix/papers/net4801/net4801.html#sect-kernel-temp-volt
> <snip>
>
>
>> Currently, the cards and mounted in the slot directly above the AMD
>> chip, although I have suggested moving the cards to the other slot.
>> The cards are rated at a max of 70 degrees Celsius, which sounds
>> reasonable, but we haven't done any temperature testing yet.
>>
>
> :) Even if it doesn't ruin the card, the Atheros chipsets (from
> experience) won't perform properly if the temperature is over 55 for
> extended periods of time. That's measured from the Soekris onboard
> temperature sensor.
>
>
FWIW, the PC-87366 is directly under the mini-PCI slot, so its
temp-reading should be
relevant to wifi performance at temp. The CPU is not under the
mini-PCI, so shouldnt
contribute as much heat to the wifi-card as the devices 'trapped'
underneath it.
At the margin, you might be able to lower temp a bit by using eth1,2 in
preference to eth0,
probably moreso if you add some vents.
> Cheers,
> Nate
>
More information about the Soekris-tech
mailing list