[Soekris] Which distro gives best performance?

[Jim Thompson]

On Dec 18, 2006, at 6:03 AM, Brett Glass wrote:

> m0n0wall is good work. The only issue I've had with it up to this
> point is that it used a unique, stripped-down version of FreeBSD
> rather than PicoBSD.

They had their reasons.

> I don't know if the latest version uses NanoBSD, but if it does
> (and if they will put work into NanoBSD so that it cross-build
> safely across processors), it ought to be great -- worth the
> code bloat, er, I mean, extra overhead of the FreeBSD 6.x kernel.

Which is slower, and why they've not moved.  And no, its not based on  
nano (or pico) bsd.

> They mention, in their beta notes, that they had to do kernel
> patches to allow simultaneous NAT and traffic shaping. I wonder
> why that would be.

You could ask.

>
> --Brett Glass
>
> At 01:54 AM 12/18/2006, Wim van Weert wrote:
>
>> Sorry? Read this please: http://m0n0.ch/wall/beta.php
>>
>> And if you read the m0n0wall mailing list it's running pretty  
>> stable for
>> those first betas. Except for the 4801, but that will be fixed the  
>> next
>> beta.
>> Everybody is excited!
>>
>> Greetz, Wim
>>
>> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
>> Van: soekris-tech-bounces at lists.soekris.com
>> [mailto:soekris-tech-bounces at lists.soekris.com] Namens wouter lists
>> Verzonden: vrijdag 15 december 2006 21:34
>> Aan: soekris-tech at lists.soekris.com
>> Onderwerp: [Soekris] Which distro gives best performance?
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm currently running monowall on my soekris net-4801. As there is  
>> not
>> much development at monowall anymore, I'm thinking of switching to
>> pfsense.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Soekris-tech mailing list
>> Soekris-tech at lists.soekris.com
>> http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech
>
> _______________________________________________
> Soekris-tech mailing list
> Soekris-tech at lists.soekris.com
> http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech