[Soekris] Which distro gives best performance?

[Brett Glass]

m0n0wall is good work. The only issue I've had with it up to this
point is that it used a unique, stripped-down version of FreeBSD
rather than PicoBSD.

I don't know if the latest version uses NanoBSD, but if it does
(and if they will put work into NanoBSD so that it cross-build
safely across processors), it ought to be great -- worth the 
code bloat, er, I mean, extra overhead of the FreeBSD 6.x kernel.

They mention, in their beta notes, that they had to do kernel
patches to allow simultaneous NAT and traffic shaping. I wonder
why that would be.

--Brett Glass

At 01:54 AM 12/18/2006, Wim van Weert wrote:
 
>Sorry? Read this please: http://m0n0.ch/wall/beta.php
>
>And if you read the m0n0wall mailing list it's running pretty stable for
>those first betas. Except for the 4801, but that will be fixed the next
>beta.
>Everybody is excited!
>
>Greetz, Wim
>
>-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
>Van: soekris-tech-bounces at lists.soekris.com
>[mailto:soekris-tech-bounces at lists.soekris.com] Namens wouter lists
>Verzonden: vrijdag 15 december 2006 21:34
>Aan: soekris-tech at lists.soekris.com
>Onderwerp: [Soekris] Which distro gives best performance?
>
>Hi all,
>
>I'm currently running monowall on my soekris net-4801. As there is not
>much development at monowall anymore, I'm thinking of switching to
>pfsense.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Soekris-tech mailing list
>Soekris-tech at lists.soekris.com
>http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech